What about max payne 3? should that be included? It's stated that the game is coming out in the fiscal year of 2009 along with red dead revolver 2. I think maybe we could remove a few, 4 seems to many in my view, even considering the fact that this article documents many rockstar games subdivisions, the fan sites seem to be about rockstar games as a whole.- Kerotan Talk Have a nice day :) 08:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Max Payne 3 I heard Sony was aquiring Rockstar, Is this true? Starwarsrulez 05:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Put simply, no. Obviously Rockstar North is a big article so it could just have a "main article: Rockstar North" link on it.:Alex. Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.117.13 ( talk) 04:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Proposed MergeĬould we perhaps merge all the articles on Rockstar Games studios (except Rockstar North) into one big article (List of Rockstar Games studios)? Because they are all quite small and are unlikely to get much bigger, so a merge might be better. Putting in a controversy thing would be good. GM Pink Elephant ( talk) 10:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC) I think you're wrong when you say Rockstar wouldn't appreciate having such a section - they are clearly an unethical company who rely on this kind of sensationalist stuff to sell their games. Manhunt, Bully and Grand Theft Auto are all Rockstar creations and you will find substantial controversy sections in each. I think it's entirely fair to include any controversy on this page. If anyone wants to put it back up, okay with me.- 70.57.196.81 04:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC) HeavyWikiMetal Though their are known to be Conteversial. I'm not a Rockstar member, but I don't think they would appreciate that. I had the right to remove "Rockstar is a conteversial ect." Global 06:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Conteversial? all games get there own pages same as studios.
#PARTY LIKE A ROCKSTAR CLEAN VERSION PLUS#
Plus this keeps everything in the same format, ex. – jello ¿? 18:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Yeah, there isn't really a need, Rockstar London is still a large company in itself and should be allocated its' own page as well. Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.166.230.77 ( talk) 10:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC) Well, with this knowledge an own article for R* London would make sense. London is just doing localization and porting for Manhunt 2, plus slight adaptation. Gamerzworld 20:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Manhunt 2 was 99% made by Rockstar Vienna before its closure. – jello ¿? 23:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC) They are making a game right now, Manhunt 2. – jello ¿? 23:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC) post scriptum: The same with R* Lincoln. Ore4444 10:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC) I think a redirect from R* London to R* Games should do very well, because the London studio is - as of what I know - only responsible for quality assurance and localization for the European market. I have never heard about Rockstar London before but I think that it should have it's own page for now, at least until they produce more games or until we know more about them. why not put them here? IronCrow 02:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC) Merging Rockstar London into Rockstar Games There's alot of suits explained in other articles against Rockstar Games. Gamerzworld 21:42, (UTC) Rather then merge the articles, leave them separate but expand on the information on this page about the RAGE engine so people can get an understanding of the engine.- Global 06:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Could be worth mentioning RAGE is going to be used more often now and it would make sense for it to have it's own page. RAGE should be merged into this page ( ZookPS3 20:03, (UTC)) I'm going to say lave it.
4 Merging Rockstar London into Rockstar Games.
0 kommentar(er)
